Blog » Youtube and the Middle Way
Youtube is a great service. It is arguably the democratic source of knowledge that formal knowledge dissemination outlets can never be. In universities and the academic system that I work in, everything has to go through carefully vetted processes of application and peer review that maintain quality of output but keep very close tabs on who and what can be published. In a world where one has to attract funding and grants while progressing one's career, there are strict limitations on what one can and cannot say. Science, certainly social science, is at times a frustratingly politicised process. On Youtube, almost anything can be said and posted and publicised, and this means that it is a great forum for debate. Here are two videos from opposites sides of the science-religion fence. The first video is of John Polkinghorne describing why he believes that science and religion are friends, and the second is Richard Dawkins describing why he thinks religion is all delusion. I am inclined to believe some of what both say, and believe that there are valid middle-way positions on this issue. All arguments get polarised, and the resolution always lies, in Hegelian splendour, somewhere in the messy middle.
Dr Olly Robinson
Hi Tony, you refer to the lack of peer review on youtube and the wide dissemination of information it and the internet generally achieves.
The result is perhaps the best misinformed generation ever - perhaps the information age has become the age of gullibility.
Indeed in this age Dawkins can dabble in theology and receive acclaim.
Sala kahle
Posted by akakiwibear, 30/10/2008 4:05pm (3 years ago)
RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments