The transcendent in physics, psychology and mysticism/religion

Posted by Olly Robinson on 20 April 2010 | 2 Comments

Tags: , , , , ,

The notion of the transcendent is one we traditionally associate with religion or with a mystically-informed worldview. The word refers to that which is ineffable, beyond normal experience and the phenomenal world.  It is traditionally associated with those worldviews that postulate a sphere of existence beyond the confines of our five senses and the material world. There is a transcendent premise in all the world’s great religions – while they disagree on whether there’s a God, or how many Gods there are, and on what the ends of life may be, they all concur on the issue of a transcendent plane of existence, or multiple planes beyond our own.

Some see the idea of the transcendent as incongruous with science – that it in some way undermines the idea of a closed and rule-bound lawful physical universe. Other don’t, and think that it’s rational to suggest that the visible world may have invisible origins and that there is more to this universe than can be accounted for by our five senses and our linguistic-rational faculties.

Here, I would like to briefly reflect on how both physics and psychology in fact provide support for the idea of the transcendent.  In psychology, we have known for a century that there is a vast space of ourselves and our pasts that we are unaware of.  We know that our conscious life is the visible tip of an iceberg, with the morass of ourselves resting dark under the surface in the unconscious. When we have visions, hear voices, experience deeply meaningful dreams, or feel deep intuitions, it is seen as the operation of mysterious forces within us, beyond our conscious control, that shape us and make us. Or when we perform mundane activities like driving or singing, we have no idea how we do it – it operates subconsciously.

Furthermore, there is now robust evidence from parapsychology to suggest that some kind of as-yet-undiscovered medium or process can transmit information between individuals. We don’t know what this is, and we don’t know if we can know what this is. It may be transcendent to our waking conscious minds.

In physics, data now suggest that we are unable to see 80% of the universe. This hidden majority is composed of dark matter. We can infer the effects of dark matter on the visible bit that we can see, but we don’t know what it is.  It is everywhere, passing through us all the time. Dark matter doesn’t interact with light, so we know it’s not composed of atoms, and if it does interact with us, we don’t know how. Every material thing in the universe is 4/5 dark matter, 1/5 normal matter. That applies to you and me too – 4/5 of you is something else, something weird that you can’t see. You are not just your visible body. That is just 20% of you. Physicists such as Jocelyn Bell Burnell tell us we are at the dawn of a new age of cosmology. And cosmology is increasingly telling us that the manifest universe is part of a greater reality that is...transcendent, in the Kantian sense. Are we at the door of a worldview which will validate ancient spiritual ideas that the world as we see it is just part of a greater reality? Maybe. Exciting times.


Post your comment

Comments

  • The question that really seems to arise here is as to where the transcendent is located. The traditional concept was that it was located in a spiritual world separated from the physical. I think the arguments against this, which I won't go into at the moment, are strong. This leaves us looking for a physical location. Dark matter or dark energy look to be candidates, as do the higher dimensions found in string theory. Failing that we might look at the idea that spacetime itself is a web or network capable of coding for such transcendent information. I'd suggest finally that consciousness rather than the unconscious looks to be the jumping off point in the brain for the transcendent, given that algorithm-based information processing seems to adequately explain the working of the unconscious mind.

    Posted by Simon Raggett, 10/05/2010 10:41pm (2 years ago)

  • Hello,

    Thank you for that very succinct and clear statement.
    To describe my philosophy to my artwork and outlook , I recently wrote this (below). My ceramics and paintings ( a few to be seen on my page on the the above website, http://www.westcorkcraft.org/ds/index.html ) are attempts to bring to the real world metaphors of mental processes that take place (and that we can be aware of) to experience this "new Science". thus acknowledging a wider awareness which we already have.--

    ------------------------------------------
    "I am very interested in the implications of “the New Physics” and quantum theory, where the certainty of the “Uncertainty Principle” prevails.

    "I am happy to accept that there has to be a complete re-think of the fundamentals of so-called conventional science, by which we are all unjustly and unhealthily ruled.

    "What the eyes see, the hands touch and the heart feels, and know to be true, are incompatible with those old ways of understanding.

    "Imagination and Art are the media for this necessary change."
    DS February, 2010.


    Posted by David Seeger, 27/04/2010 12:19pm (2 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments